November 1932: Hitler, FDR and European central bankers

The headline of most stock markets reports yesterday said something like “Stocks: Worst Thanksgiving Drop Since ’32”. That made me think – what really happened in November 1932?

As is the case this time around European worries dominated the financial headlines back in November 1932. The first of two key events of November 1932 was the German federal elections on November 6 1932. We all know the outcome – Hitler’s National Socialist Germans Workers’ Party (NSDAP) won a landslide victory and got 33.1% of the vote. As the Communist Party won 16.9% the totalitarian parties commanded a firm majority – what at the time was called the “negative majority”. This eventually led to the formation of Hitler’s first cabinet in January 1933.

The second key event of November 1932 of course was the US presidential elections. Two days after the German in elections Franklin D. Roosevelt won the US presidential elections defeating incumbent president Herbert Hoover on November 8 1932. FDR of course in 1933 took the US of the gold standard, but also introduced the catastrophic National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA).

Going through the New York Times articles of November 1932 I found a short article on the gold standard in which it said the following:

“Governors of Europe’s central banks who met today (November 13 1932) at the Bank of International Settlements expressed the unanimous opinion that the gold standard was the only basis on which the world economic situation could be bettered”

Obviously we today’s know that the failed gold standard was the key reason for the Great Depression and especially European central bankers’ desperate attempt to save the failed monetary regime created the environment in which Hitler and his nazi party was able to win the German elections in November 1932. What would have happened for example if Germany had been given proper debt relief, the European central banks had given up the gold standard and the French central bank had stopped the hoarding of gold?

Had I been a Marxist I would had been extremely depressed today because then I would had believed in historical determinism. Fortunately I think we can learn from history and avoid repeating past mistakes. I hope today’s European central bankers share this view and will learn a bit from the events of November 1932.

If European central bankers this time around decide not to learn from events of 1932 then they might be interested in learning about the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian currency union in 1919. Then they just have to read this excellent paper by Peter Garber and Michael Spencer.

Leave a comment

7 Comments

  1. NB

     /  March 28, 2013

    Wrong! The failed gold standard? As opposed to the current fiat disaster we are experiencing now? You cannot argue that gold is more stable than the current system when we have experienced what we did in 2008 and what we are likely to experience going forward. Also, fiat money allows the government to extract wealth via the hidden inflationary tax. As our incomes and savings account shrink and prices go up and buying power goes down the absence of a gold standard is sending us all into poverty. Further inflating the money is the disgusting fractional reserve banking system. Its a hoax designed to enslave people with debt and undermine their wealth. Wake up you fools.

    Reply
    • NB

       /  March 28, 2013

      Correction: You cannot argue that gold is **less** stable

      Reply
  1. No Nouriel, I am no longer optimistic – it feels like 1932 « The Market Monetarist
  2. 1931-33 – we should learn something from history « The Market Monetarist
  3. The painful knowledge of monetary history « The Market Monetarist
  4. ラルス・クリステンセン 「1932年11月 ~ヒトラー、ルーズベルト、欧州のセントラルバンカー~」 — 経済学101
  5. Mussolini’s great monetary policy failure | The Market Monetarist

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Market Monetarist

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading